Created in 2008, the Prix Levallois supports photographers under 35, of all nationalities. All projects are welcome : the Prize does not impose any theme or format, only the quality of the work counts in the selection of artists.

"Inexorably, images keep on illustrating the world. By its quality, its suspension of time, photography is a tool of choice to question this same world. All subjects and all forms are fields of investigation. Today, photography plays with its technical freedom, from analog to digital, from black and white to colours, to let the authors develop their perception. The aim of the Prix Levallois is to select among the international photo production, quality, originality and excellence."

Catherine Dérioz and Jacques Damez, directors of the Galerie Le Réverbère, artistic directors of the Prix Levallois 2018-2020

Fifteen finalist photographers are chosen by the art directors, to be presented and defended with impartiality and sympathetically before a jury composed by personalities from the world of photography, the sponsor of the Prize and the Deputy Mayor for cultural affairs of the City of Levallois.

Will be elected, the Prize winner who receives a € 10,000 grant and a Special Mention who receives a DSLR camera.

The Audience award is attributed by photography lovers who will choose online, their favourite photographer according to the rule of one click per day.

Another great reward for the three winners : the conception of an exhibition — with the help of the art directors — that will be presented at L’Escale gallery, in Levallois on October 2020. For the first time, it will be an itinerant exhibition welcomed by La Passerelle, Scène nationale des Alpes du Sud, in Gap in January 2021.

The sponsor 2020 Jane Evelyn Atwood

Jane Evelyn Atwood is one of the first women photographer that faced up to society’s ardent issues by taking frontally charge of the subject with full conceptual, visual, and political requirements. Thanks to a characteristic writing and sensitivity — those of a free woman — she finds a respectful distance to deal with her topics. Her relevant approach has made her, nowadays a reference.

Catherine Dérioz and Jacques Damez

 
Jane Evelyn Atwood was born in New York and has been living in France since 1971. Her work translates the profound intimacy she establishes with her subjects over long periods of time. Fascinated by people and the idea of exclusion, she has managed to penetrate worlds that most of us ignore or choose to ignore.

In 1976 she began to photograph women prostitutes on the rue des Lombards in Paris. This work that lasted all night, every night for one year became her first book. In 1980 she received the first W. Eugene Smith Award to continue photographing the blind.
In the following years she completed several long-term projects : Pigalle, legionnaires, victims of anti-personnel mines, Haiti, and Jean-Louis, the first person with AIDS in Europe to appear in the press. In 1989 she undertook a vast project on female incarceration, gaining access to some of the worst prisons in Europe and the United-States, including death row. This monumental, ten-year work remains a reference today. She is the author of thirteen books, including a monograph in the prestigious Photo Poche collection. She has won some of the most important awards and her images may be found in public and private collections.
Her archives are distributed in France by Vu’ Agency and in the United States by Contact Press Images. In France she is represented by the Gallery In Camera, and in the United States by L. Parker Stephenson.

Like privious years, she should have taught a workshop for the Rencontres de la Photo in Arles, in spring and summer 2020

http://janeevelynatwood.com/
 
 

2019 : In a few words

"The 2019 Prix Levallois confirms its international status : 670 candidates from 77 nationalities (France, 278; Russia, 68; Iran, 50; Italy, 21...) with near-perfect parity! After looking at more than 10,000 photographs, we have chosen 15 photographers (8 women, 7 men). They are from a number of different countries: France (3), Russia (3), Italy (2), Iran (2), India (1), Mexico (1), Costa Rica (1), Belgium (1) and the UK (1).

As we did during the selection process in 2018, we have paid close attention to the general trends present in the portfolios we received. This year’s offering confirmed the dominance of documentary photography, often giving the sense that it is only the subject which counts - as if this on its own were enough!


However, we did also receive many portraits and self-portraits, still lifes, landscapes, bodies in nature, environmental subjects, and yet again a large number of works in black and  white.
In our view, photography is a way of writing about the world, not a banal method for recording it. While making our selection, we prioritised those candidates who did not give in to the temptations of imagery, and who rather presented true photographic challenges, both in their engagement with, and reflection on, their subjects, and in the quality of their conceptual and plastic ways of writing. 
Now it’s your turn to explore our selection, which we hope is qualitative and invigorating."


Catherine Dérioz et Jacques Damez - Galerie Le Réverbère

2018 : Preface by Jacques Damez

Prix Levallois, 10 ans ! Une collection photographique

“In 2008, the Prix Levallois arose in the head of a few people, who share the same interest: a compelling necessity to create an event to promote photography and photographers. Let us remind that the photo club of Levallois-Perret was born on May 22, 1902, and still exists! This historical background might have facilitated a fertile cultural ground for photography. We must not forget the importance of the ICART photography school and its director, Mark Grosset, with whom Stéphane Decreps — The Deputy Mayor of the city of Levallois — gave substance and soul to this prize.
 Of course, as every adventure, this one didn’t imagine its own longevity, it rather banked on the future. Most of all, it was important to organize and create the structure, conceptualize its challenges, and set the rules. This is how everything started.


From the first year, photographs of the laureate integrated the collections of the city. Ten years later, a representative ensemble is here to profile the prize. There are several periods during this decade, due to different personalities in charge of the artistic direction (Paul Frèches 2008-2014, Fannie Escoulen 2015-2017). This fact underlines that a collection is still in motion, it is not a single chronology, neither an inert theme, but a process crossed by successive subjectivities that enhance it.


Under the same word, different models are treated, without having a lot in common. May they be public, private, or corporate, the collections could only be similar in the way they preserve an ensemble of objets to create a corpus. Their aim, their public, the urges that made them could be poles apart. The fact that, in France, public collections are unalienable already change things, in comparison to other collections. Moreover, we might consider that the recognition of a work of art is increasingly due to the market’s instability.


Building a collection is a major project: by gathering works, it is a way to produce a thought, to create a dialogue between art and ideology, between individuality and collective memory; it is a way of questioning frontiers between the classification of genres and mediums. A collection of books, of records, of videos is, for each one, built upon specific expectations and particular ranking systems. Some rank in alphabetical order, others by genres, others by the color of the spine ... these options tell a lot about the ones that took them. It is the same for an art collection; we are facing different propositions of imaginary museum that tell as much about the ones who created them as the artworks that form them. As a viewer, it is noted to progress in the heart of a collection, with slowness and respect. It is a very intimate invitation to share a life experience. Understanding the whisper and the logic that preside over the collection are the only ways to judge it. The succession and juxtaposition of signatures aren’t enough to make it magic, the wonder rather comes from unspooling the ball of emotions that built up the ensemble.


The same can’t apply to the collection of Levallois, since it is not the result of a single mind, nor a curator that, in a long term work, draws a line. There is a space left to chance, and to the unexpected. Hundreds of applications, under the watchful supervision of the artistic direction (periodically renewed), are examined to select 15 shortlisted photographers whose projects are submitted to an independent jury (5 persons, 4 of which are part of the world of photography chosen by the artistic director and the Deputy Mayor for cultural affairs from the city of Levallois). From that, a laureate is selected and two or three of his photographs integrate the collection. Therefore, it is the juxtaposition of collegial artistic decisions. We are facing a collection that make visible the emergence of generations: on the one hand, young photographers — since the prize is dedicated to people under 35 — and on the other hand, the succeeding jurors.


No doubt, here is a historical and sociological fascinating field, since it concerns the preservation, through the years, of the tendencies of the new generation of international photographers chosen by their peers.


It is a succession of subjects, aesthetic choices, techniques that mark its time. It is a collection that, by its own structure, leaves traces of what it is made of. It is not attached to a specific command, nor a bias, over the different teams that took charge of it; it delineates the spirit of the epoch.
Its coherence can’t be found in an obvious straight line that would provide direction. It is rather a picking through tendencies, times, and those who live it. As we live in a rational country that likes rules, people could be disconcerted, because there is no apparent rules.


May we underline that, for a few years, questions about collections started to open up.


Museums, increasingly acquire vernacular photographs, which were not allowed until now.


Raw art mixes with the most sophisticated art, combinations of mediums and genres spread through the exhibition spaces; the visual arts couples with the performing arts to produce new forms. What used to be obvious vanishes, giving place to other fields of analysis. Visual, conceptual and political dialogues create chimeras that need to be preserved and thought with new patterns.


Photographic prizes, as the Prix Levallois, take part in the formation of this nebula.
Of course, ten years is just a beginning — remarkable beginning, because it is not easy! — nevertheless, it is still young. It requires to believe in a real longevity, to imagine the fifty years of the prize, and then observe through five volumes, the bias of each generation facing its own time. This first hindsight launches the principle that will be repeated over five decades, articulated between them by generational breaks, each of them being traversed by the mutations of the treatment of subjects and the world.


As a consequence, it is likely that, some forgotten parts of photography would find a place, theirs, neither more nor less, like vernacular photography, today in museums. Let’s think about the diversity of treatment, and the place of wedding photography, in the world today, or medical, scientific, technical, food, and family photography... These different types of photography actually left out from exhibitions, may not remain aside, infinitely. Will we see them emerge thanks to these new selection methods that characterize prizes?
It is a challenge, it is worth dreaming.”

Jacques Damez - Galerie Le Réverbère

Translation : Pauline Jurado Barroso
 

Exhibition view Prix Levallois, 10 ans ! Une collection photographique ©Galerie Le Réverbère

12 Photographers / Laureates of the Prix Levallois
Marvi Lacar (2008), Shira Igell (2009), Virginie Terrasse (2010), Alexander Gronsky (2011), Sophie Jung (2012), Max Pinckers (2013), Esther Teichmann (2014), Tom Callemin (2015), Vasantha Yogananthan (2016), Bieke Depoorter (2017), Pierre-Elie de Pibrac (2018), and Sara Imloul (2019).
From July 1 to July 7, 2019
ENSP - École Nationale Supérieure de la Photographie d'Arles, galerie du haut, 16 rue des Arènes, Arles